Corante

In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Future Tense

« The Future is Already Here - It's Just Not Evenly Distributed | Main | Welcome to Future Tense »

June 28, 2005

Commitment and Engagement

Email This Entry

Posted by Elizabeth Albrycht

A couple of weeks ago there was some interesting commentary happening in employee communications and HR blogs about a study released by Northwestern University about employee engagement.

Our own Regina Miller was in the thick of it. I am not going to rehash the various posts (go read the links above, as they are all substantive explanations), but I wanted to draw your attention to a distinction that struck me as interesting and useful: that between commitment and engagement.

The Mirriam-Webster Online definitions of commitment and engagement are not tremendously helpful in clarifying the distinction between the two (both have to do with having an emotional involvement). Interestingly enough, however, in its definition, commitment has the implication of being impelled (pushed) while engagement has the implication of being a personal choice.

Before looking at these definitions, I had suggested (in comments) that a good way to think about the difference between the two was that commitment was more of an emotional state of mind, while engagement encompassed action.

Now, my goal here isn't to parse definitions, but rather try to understand what it is that we need to do as communicators or HR people, for example, to keep employees from leaving their company. Should our goal be to foster commitment -- an emotional state, but passive (and maybe forced) -- or engagement, where an employee is taking action based on his or her personal choice?

I, for one, vote for engagement. And that has implications for the kind of communications we undertake. If our goal is to persuade people to action (vs. some happy happy joy joy state of mind), laminated pocket cards with values statements aren't the way to go. An active blog written by lead executives who encourage employee comments and geniunely tries to communicate might be. Better yet, encouraging your employees to blog themselves could be a powerful strategy as well.

There are a myriad of ways that a focus on engagement can help us rethink our strategies and tactics. I bet Regina can give us a few examples from HR!

[Tags: ]

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Communications


COMMENTS

1. Jim Ware on June 28, 2005 11:29 AM writes...

Elizabeth, you are on to something here, and I vote with you for engagement as the thing that matters most.

For me, commitment suggests a willful intention to see something through, but it may or may not be something you care about.

Engagement, on the other hand, involves deep personal feelings about a common goal. When I am engaged with a task, I have internalized its purpose, and it has genuine personal meaning for me.

Now, to relate that to organizational life, when employees (and/or contractors) are engaged with the organization's purpose and meaning, they have adopted it as their own, and they care as much about success as the CEO or any other member of the executive team. Engaged employees will "charge the hill" no matter how challenging the task, and they'll proselytize the organization's mission to anyone they meet.

Clearly, that's an idea situation, assuming the organization's mission is noble and just (remember that the Reverend Jimmy Jones had a whole lot of engaged followers join him in a suicide pact at Jonestown - leadership can be focused on both good and bad goals).

So let's learn more about engagement. It's a powerful concept.

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Bob Sutton on Crappy People versus Crappy Systems
New bloggers on the future of work
Circles of knowledge and boundaries of ignorance
Tool-and-Die Makers in a Knowledge Economy
Wikiwise 50: #45 -- Yahoo!
Knowledge management, reinvention, and innovation
Balancing diligence and laziness
Wikiwise 50: #46 -- Microsoft